iccforum.com
The Outreach Question — Comments | International Criminal Court Forum
http://iccforum.com/forum/outreach
Video Introduction by Fatou Bensouda. Exit Interview by Luis Moreno-Ocampo. Security Council Lecture Video. Background — SGBV. Background — Outreach. Background — Arrest. Background — Exit Interview. Background — Africa. Background — Mass Rape. Background — Reparations. Background — Prevention. Background — Libya. Background — Oversight. Background — Darfur. Background — Gaza Jurisdiction. Background — Lectures. The Outreach Question Comments. Comment on the Outreach Question:. February 17, 2015. In orde...
lawreview.uchicago.edu
Volume 80, Issue 3 (Summer 2013) | The University of Chicago Law Review | The University of Chicago
https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/page/volume-80-issue-3-summer-2013
Skip to main content. The University of Chicago Law Review. The University of Chicago. Volume 80, Issue 3 (Summer 2013). Volume 80, Issue 3 (Summer 2013) 953-1555. Judging the Flood of Litigation. Marin K. Levy. When Nudges Fail: Slippery Defaults. Lauren E. Willis. The Firearm-Disability Dilemma: Property Insights into Felon Gun Rights. Frederick C. Benson. Pleading in Technicolor: When Can Litigants Incorporate Audiovisual Works into Their Complaints? S Mixed Message regarding Variance Calculations.
lawreview.uchicago.edu
Volume 81, Issue 2 (Spring 2014) | The University of Chicago Law Review | The University of Chicago
https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/page/volume-81-issue-2-spring-2014
Skip to main content. The University of Chicago Law Review. The University of Chicago. Volume 81, Issue 2 (Spring 2014). Volume 81, Issue 2 (Spring 2014) 417-849. Group to Individual (G2i) Inference in Scientific Expert Testimony. David L. Faigman, John Monahan and Christopher Slobogin. Game Theory and the Structure of Administrative Law. Habeas and the Roberts Court. Aziz Z. Huq. Cost-Benefit Analysis and Agency Independence. Michael A. Livermore. Nathan H. Jack. The Liberalism of Love. Volume 79.1 ...
lawreview.uchicago.edu
The Political Economy of Crowdsourcing: Markets for Labor, Rewards, and Securities | The University of Chicago Law Review | The University of Chicago
https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/page/political-economy-crowdsourcing-markets-labor-rewards-and-securities
Skip to main content. The University of Chicago Law Review. The University of Chicago. The Political Economy of Crowdsourcing: Markets for Labor, Rewards, and Securities. Richard A. Epstein. 82 U Chi L Rev Dialogue 35 (2015) [ Essay PDF. By lowering the cost of entry, Wikipedia facilitates competition within and across academic disciplines. I Crowdsourcing in Labor Markets. Selected by parties inside the firm. Consider the following description:. This advantage of crowdsourcing could prove especially sig...
lawreview.uchicago.edu
How a “Labor Dispute” Would Help the NCAA | The University of Chicago Law Review | The University of Chicago
https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/page/how-“labor-dispute”-would-help-ncaa
Skip to main content. The University of Chicago Law Review. The University of Chicago. How a Labor Dispute Would Help the NCAA. Michael H. LeRoy. 81 U Chi L Rev Dialogue 44. When a ruling by a National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) regional director determined that Northwestern University football players who receive athletic scholarships are employees. Ironically, to achieve this success the NFL players. Their union so that they could avoid the duty to bargain under the NLRA. During this time, there was ...
uchicagolsa.wordpress.com
Student-Edited Journals | UChicago Law Students Association
https://uchicagolsa.wordpress.com/journals
UChicago Law Students Association. The Chicago Journal of International Law. The University of Chicago Law Review. The University of Chicago Legal Forum. Blog at WordPress.com.
lawreview.uchicago.edu
A Conceptual Framework for the Regulation of Cryptocurrencies | The University of Chicago Law Review | The University of Chicago
https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/page/conceptual-framework-regulation-cryptocurrencies
Skip to main content. The University of Chicago Law Review. The University of Chicago. A Conceptual Framework for the Regulation of Cryptocurrencies. 82 U Chi L Rev Dialogue 53 (2015) [ Essay PDF. This Essay explains how regulatory instruments can be so designed. One such regulatory instrument is proposed as an example an elective anonymity tax on cryptocurrency transactions in which at least one party is not anonymous. I Virtues, Vices, and Regulatory Challenges. Bitcoin, a cryptocurrency. And as a dece...
lawreview.uchicago.edu
Campaign Finance, Federalism, and the Case of the Long-Armed Donor | The University of Chicago Law Review | The University of Chicago
https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/page/campaign-finance-federalism-and-case-long-armed-donor
Skip to main content. The University of Chicago Law Review. The University of Chicago. Campaign Finance, Federalism, and the Case of the Long-Armed Donor. Todd E. Pettys. 81 U Chi L Rev Dialogue 77. While promoting a new book this past spring,. Retired justice John Paul Stevens sat down for interviews with Jeffrey Toobin of the. And Adam Liptak of the. In both conversations, Stevens sharply criticized the ruling that the US Supreme Court had handed down a few weeks earlier in. It’s a grossly incorrect de...
lawreview.uchicago.edu
The Problem of Biased Experts, and Blinding as a Solution: A Response to Professor Gelbach | The University of Chicago Law Review | The University of Chicago
https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/page/problem-biased-experts-and-blinding-solution-response-professor-gelbach
Skip to main content. The University of Chicago Law Review. The University of Chicago. The Problem of Biased Experts, and Blinding as a Solution: A Response to Professor Gelbach. 81 U Chi L Rev Dialogue 61. In a recent symposium article, Professor Jonah Gelbach discusses the problem that a litigant in the American adversarial system can consult multiple expert witnesses on a given question but only disclose the single most favorable opinion to the fact finder (a jury, judge, or arbitrator). Professor Gel...
lawreview.uchicago.edu
Volume 81, Issue 1 (Winter 2014) | The University of Chicago Law Review | The University of Chicago
https://lawreview.uchicago.edu/page/volume-81-issue-1-winter-2014
Skip to main content. The University of Chicago Law Review. The University of Chicago. Volume 81, Issue 1 (Winter 2014). Volume 81, Issue 1 (Winter 2014) 1-416. Revelation Mechanisms and the Law. Governing Communities by Auction. Abraham Bell and Gideon Parchomovsky. Yun-chien Chang and Lee Anne Fennell. Savage Tables and Tort Law: An Alternative to the Precaution Model. Janet M. Currie and W. Bentley MacLeod. Revelation and Suppression of Private Information in Settlement-Bargaining Models. Ordered Libe...